Genealogy

Some people have discovered this blog by searching for Dimicks and/or their ancestors, many of whom appear in Chapter Five of “Model City.”  In hopes of attracting even more genealogy buffs with whom to trade information, I decided to post a good part of my family tree here — not only my father’s side, but my mother’s also.  I am putting the Dimick family first, because it is the longest unbroken line that I have.

The first page (1.  Dimick/Crick) lists (a) the first few branches of the Dimick family tree from my paternal grandfather backward, (b) the branches of the Crick family tree from my paternal grandmother back as far as I can go, and (c) the line of descent from Elder Thomas Dimmock (the first Dimmock/Dimock/Dimmick/Dimick to come to America) to me.  I have not entered into my database all of the descendants of Elder Thomas for whom I have records — as this would be a monumental task, his descendants being so numerous — but only those which lead to me.

Subsequent sub-pages of Page 1 continue my paternal family tree back almost to the Norman Conquest.

The second page (2.  Phearman/Jones), and sub-pages under that, show my maternal family tree, some branches of which also are traceable to European royalty.

A Note on Navigation:

The blog template I am using has a bit of an awkward navigation process.  You place your mouse over “Genealogy,” move it down to the first sub-page and then to the right for subsequent sub-sub-pages.  If you are confused, I don’t blame you.  So following is (I hope) an easier way to get around on this site:

Page 1.  Dimick/Crick. Five generations back from my paternal grandfather, Roy Alvin Dimick (1899 – 1968).  Four generations back from Daisy Lou Crick (1902 – 1966) to the end of her line as I have been able to trace it.  Descent from Elder Thomas Dimick to me.  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/

Page 1.A.  Dimick/Sanders/Battin. Continuation backwards of the Dimick family tree.  Six generations back from John Dimick, Jr. (1753 – 1842) to Elder Thomas Dimick.  Six generations back from Mordecai Sanders (Est. 1749-78 to Est. 1803-1863.)  Five generations back from Espey Battin (1804 – 1869.)  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/1-a-dimick/

Page 1.A.i.  Hammond/Hull/Lumbert/Derby. Further continuation of the Dimick line.  Eight generations back from Ann Hammond (1609 – 1683.)  Five generations back from Joanna Hull (1620 – 1683.)  Three generations back from Bernard Lumbert (1608 – Est. 1629-1698.)  Six generations back from John Derby (1610 – 1655.)  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/1-a-i/

Page 1.A.i.a.  John Mohun.  Five generations back from John Mohun (Est. 1430-1484 to Est. 1468-1562.)  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/1-a-i-a/

Page 1.A.ii.  Bradford/Carpenter/Fitch/Reeve. Seven generations back from William Bradford (1588/89 – 1657).  Eight generations back from Alice Carpenter (1590 – 1670).  Eight generations back from Thomas Fitch (1590 – 1632).  Four generations back from Ann Reeve (1590 – 1632).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/1-a-ii/

Page 1.A.iii.  Peck. A total of 16 generations of ancestors of Ann Peck (1619 – 1672), going back to shortly after the Norman Conquest.  Chart 1 goes back eight generations.  Chart 2 goes back another eight generations from John Peck (1402 – 1461), who was Ann Peck’s fifth great-grandfather.  Chart 3 goes back eight generations from John Middleton (1349 – 1386), who was also Ann Peck’s fifth great-grandfather.  Click here: http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/1-dimickcrick/1-a-iii/

Page 2.  Phearman/Jones. Five generations back from my maternal grandfather, Charles Henry Phearman (1874 – 1964) to a dead-end on all branches.  The first five generations back from my maternal grandmother, Mabel Lafayette Jones (1884 – 1967).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/

2.A.  Stearns/Blanchard/Lovell. Eight generations back from John Burt Stearns (1764 – 1848).  Eight generations back from John Blanchard (1769 – 1835).  Eight generations back from Mary Lovell (1773 – 1825).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2a/

2.A.i.  Barker/Bere/Willard/Iggleden. Five generations back from John Barker (1563 – 1616/17).  Four generations back from James Bere (1530 – 1563).  Four generations back from Richard Willard (1554 – 1615/16).  Five generations back from Stephen Iggleden (1552 – 1604/05).  Click here:   http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2-a-i/

2.A.ii.a.  Crosby/Sotheron/Brigham/Peck/Kidder. Four generations back from Thomas Crosby (1501 – 1557/58).  Three generations back from John Sotheron (1500 – 1547).  Three generations back from Thomas Brigham (1525 – 1557/58).  Eight generations back from Robert Peck (1580 – 1656).  Four generations back from John Kidder (1520 – 1599).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2-a-ii-a/

2.A.ii.a(1):  Peck/Hammerton. Eight generations back from Richard Peck (1351 – 1405).  Eight generations back from Margaret Hammerton (1477 – 1490).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2-a-ii-a1/

2.A.ii.b.  Baldwin/Kinge/Welles/French/Morse/Shephard. Eight generations back from Henry Baldwin (1529 – 1602).  Three generations back from Alice Kinge (1532 – 1626).  Three generations back from Robert Welles (1540 – 1619).  Three generations back from Thomas French (1562 – 1612/13).  Five generations back from Thomas Morse (1567 – 1601).  Three generations back from Rose Shephard (1549 – 1625).  Click here:  http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2-a-ii-b/

2.A.ii.b(1).   Fitz-Alan. Eight generations back from William Fitz-Alan (1360 – 1400).  Click here:   http://www.dimicklaw.net/thoughts/genealogy/phearman/2-a-ii-b-1/

No comments yet.

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 13 + 3 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is: